The importance of identity is of reoccurring interest in the profession and garners special concern when a city undergoes modernization. In fact, identity seems to drive these types of transformations; and although cities keep a tight hold on identities they know to represent them well, they often lack the strength to execute based on those values. Modernization strategies tend toward one of two extremes: the establishment of and adherence to strict historic preservation regulations, or the breeding of starchitecture.
Instead, this post suggests transitional design as a viable option for transforming existing models of urban modernization while at the same time nurturing the shared contextual cultures of a setting.
In the first strategy of preserving identity, impenetrable regulations formulated to protect architectural jewels can block planning efforts, and long application processes make it difficult for changes to occur. Oftentimes, these actions can be counterproductive and subsequently lead to the asphyxiation of old urban centers. By contrast, the second strategy that seeks to create an entirely new identity presents forceful change but typically makes no effort to meet the needs of the surrounding culture.
Since neither strategy performs well in such an idealistic way, perhaps we can learn from urban centers that have successfully transitioned into modernization with their identities intact. Prague, for example, weaves its modern urban center through historic fabric, valuing its ancient building facades in part because they enable us to reconstruct and participate with the city’s history in the present.
This organic transformation process, which could be defined as transitional design, is a balanced approach that honors historical value but allows change to occur. Transitional design is mostly known in the world of interiors. It can be thought of as the yin and yang of traditional and modern elements working in concert; the coming together of classic pieces and contemporary finishes, for instance. Why should the same concept not be applied to the modernization of landscapes? The amalgamation of historical landscapes and contemporary inserts can meet new needs while effectively providing the continuity of a strong identity.
The future of urban modernization cannot rely on stagnant antiquated forms or modern encapsulations that stand alone; instead it yearns for a holistic strategy that embraces change and permanence through the creative manipulations of existing infrastructures in order to assure a stable identity.
“Baroque Court Apartments” image by Tomaz Gregoric, courtesy of OFIS arhitekti
Posted by Nabyl Macias in Arts and Culture, Community, Landscape Urbanism, Restoration on